Home  > Our Firm  > Recent Successes

Recent Successes

Chavez & Gertler Protects Rights of Californians to Sue for Denial of Medical Coverage

Chavez & Gertler is one of the attorneys for the plaintiffs in Anderson v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc., which addresses an issue of urgent public importance:  whether one of California's leading purveyors of health care can lawfully deny coverage for accepted behavioral and physical therapies required by children afflicted with ASD. 

The plaintiffs in Anderson, parents of autistic children and the nonprofit organization Equal Coverage for Autism, claim that Kaiser has violated California's Mental Health Parity Law ("MHPL") by failing to provide children diagnosed with ASD full and equal access to medically necessary treatments under the same terms that it provides similar services to plan members who have other medical conditions. 

While Anderson is pending, Chavez & Gertler filed a "friend of the court" or "amicus curiae" brief in another case, Arce v Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc., which alleges similar denials of benefits for autism.  In a recent decision in that case, the Court of Appeal agreed with the amicus arguments and affirmed the right of consumers to bring class action lawsuits against health plans that systematically deny benefits for covered medical conditions such as ASD. 

As a result of the Court's decision, the plaintiffs will be allowed to litigate two questions of vital interest:  (1) whether Kaiser's health plan contract excludes certain therapies for ASD because they are "non-health care" rather than "medical" services, and (2) whether, if it does, the exclusion violates the MHPL.

If you have information about this and would like to contact us, please click here

Permanent Injunction Protects Rights of California's Youth

In connection with the settlement of a suit brought two years ago against the Corrections Standards Authority, the state agency responsible for being a watchdog over California’s juvenile halls, and led by Chavez & Gertler, the San Francisco Superior Court issued a permanent injunction that will close down California county juvenile halls that fail to meet minimum state standards.  The suit alleged that the CSA failed for many years to address the illegal conditions that persisted in juvenile halls.  Mark A. Chavez said, “We initiated this lawsuit to rectify the deplorable conditions in California’s juvenile halls.  The Court’s injunction will force county juvenile halls to comply with the state’s minimum standards designed to protect juveniles, or face being shut down.”

If you have information about this and would like to contact us, please click here

Hole-in-One for Disabled and Senior Golfers

In a disability civil rights case against Marriott International, Inc. with far reaching implications, the firm and its co-counsel, Disability Rights Advocates, have achieved a significant victory for disabled and senior golfers.  Federal Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton in San Francisco ruled that Marriott violated the ADA, the California Disabled Persons Act and the Unruh Act by refusing to provide accessible golf carts as a reasonable accommodation “for plaintiffs’ with mobility impairments”.   Nance Becker, of Chavez & Gertler, commenting on the decision stated:  “We hope [the] decision will make Marriott Resorts more welcoming for their potential customers, and encourage other golf resorts to do the same.”

If you have information about this and would like to contact us, please click here

Settlement with On-line Travel Companies a Major Victory for Disabled Travelers

Expedia Inc. and its subsidiary Hotels.com are two of the world's leading online travel companies.  As the result of a class action lawsuit brought by Chavez & Gertler, Public Justice, and Disability Rights Advocates, disabled travelers who use those websites can now search for lodgings that have the accommodations they need - such as accessible entry ways, roll-in showers, and telephone equipment for the deaf.  The two travel companies have also for the first time adopted procedures enabling consumers to request and reserve hotel rooms with the access features they require. 

Our lawsuit, filed on behalf of AXIS Dance Company and dancers Bonnie Lewkowicz and Judith Smith, both wheelchair users, alleged that the travel company's failure to provide such services deprived individuals with disabilities of equal access to travel discounts and packages available to non-disabled people, and thus violated California's anti-discrimination laws. 

Expedia reports that since the changes were implemented in August 2009, it has published accessibility options for more than 15,000 hotels, and the Expedia.com call center has received 500 requests per week utilizing the new web features.

If you have information about this and would like to contact us, please click here

Chavez & Gertler Wins $2.6 Million for Injured Truck Driver

Chavez & Gertler partner Jon Gertler won nearly $3 million for a Teamster who suffered head and back injuries after a big rig driver fell asleep at the wheel and smashed into the cement truck he was driving. The Sacramento County jury deliberated for two days after more than three weeks of trial before rendering the award.  "This money will be enough to give the Madrid family back the security Tom had built through incredibly hard work in the years before this needless tragedy."

If you have information about this and would like to contact us, please click here

$105 Million Settlement in GMAC Class Action

In coordinated class actions filed against GMAC, one of the largest finance companies in the world, Chavez & Gertler successfully represented a class of over 30,000 consumers challenging GMAC's collection of loan balances. Chavez & Gertler was appointed lead counsel for the class by the Santa Clara County Superior Court and assumed primary responsibility for handling of all the trial and appellate proceedings in the litigation. After eight years of protracted litigation and trial, the firm recently achieved a $105 million settlement for the class. GMAC Reposession Cases, Judicial Council Coordination Proceeding No. 4237 (Santa Clara County Supreme Court)

If you have information about this and would like to contact us, please click here

$5.5 Million Recovery Against Silicon Graphics

Chavez & Gertler served as counsel for various categories of technical support employees at Silicon Graphics, Inc. ("SGI") in California who alleged that SGI illegally treated these employees as "exempt" under California labor law so it did not have to pay them overtime. The parties entered into a settlement resolving these claims that provided $5.5 million in restitution for the employees. Sweeney v. Silicon Graphics Inc., Case No. C-00-20731 (Santa Clara County Superior Court)

If you have information about this and would like to contact us, please click here

$9 Million Verdict in Train Crash Case against Burlington Northern

Chavez & Gertler won a major trial victory against Burlington Northern, one of the largest railroads in the nation. The case arose from a collision at a dangerous railroad crossing between a train and a PG&E truck driver. The driver suffered traumatic brain damage and spinal fractures. The trial, which was handled by Chavez & Gertler partner Jon Gertler, lasted about nine weeks.

The jury found that the railroad, then called Burlington Northern Santa Fe, was negligent in causing the collision at an unmarked and unsafe railroad crossing, and rendered a total verdict of almost $9 million. The jury also found that the railroad acted despicably, and ordered it to pay $2 million in punishment or punitive damages for consciously disregarding the safety of the public.

At the end of the trial, a railroad executive agreed in open court to inspect all 10,000 or so of its private railroad crossings to make sure they are not unsafe and make them safe where necessary. Pietrowski v. BNSF RR Case No., C 02-00335 C 02-00335 (Contra Costa County Superior Court).

If you have information about this and would like to contact us, please click here

$3.1 Million Verdict in Helicopter Crash Trial

Chavez & Gertler won a $3.1 million jury verdict for an injured electrical worker in a jury trial arising out of a helicopter crash. Chavez & Gertler partner Jon Gertler tried the case for a month in San Francisco Superior Court. The worker was working on a tower 100 feet above the ground when a helicopter that was used to transport the workers struck the tower, knocking him to a lower level. He suffered spinal injuries and was permanently disabled. Scott v. Trinity Helicopters, Inc. Case No: 02-408924 (San Francisco County Superior Court).

If you have information about this and would like to contact us, please click here

$76 Million Settlement in Transouth Cases

Chavez & Gertler represented a class of over 19,000 consumers in actions challenging the efforts of a related group of finance companies to collect amounts purportedly owed by their automobile borrowers. The actions alleged that the borrowers did not owe the amounts that the finance companies were attempting to collect and that the collection efforts were unlawful. Chavez & Gertler served as lead counsel for the class in the litigation and ultimately negotiated a $76 million settlement for class members. Transouth Cases, Judicial Council Coordination Proceeding No. 4273 (Santa Clara County Superior Court).

If you have information about this and would like to contact us, please click here

Trial Victory Worth over $12 Million for America Honda Borrowers

Chavez & Gertler won a court trial against American Honda Finance Corporation which resulted in benefits of well over $12.4 million for consumers whose repossessed vehicles were sold without proper legal notice.

The trial featured a head-to-head match-up of leading complex litigation firms for the plaintiff and defense. Chavez & Gertler founding partners Jon Gertler and Mark Chavez tried the case in San Francisco Superior Court against John Quinn, the founder and named partner in the 200+ lawyer firm of Quinn, Emanuel, Urquhart and Oliver in Los Angeles.

The case was brought under California's private attorney general and unfair business practice law on behalf of a large group of mostly low income borrowers. It alleged various violations of consumer laws protecting persons who pay for their cars through loans obtained through the car dealer. Chavez & Gertler won a complete victory at trial after the court found that American Honda had unlawfully attempted to collect more than $12 million from borrowers. The judgment entered by the Court required the return of the money already collected, with interest, and further ordered the company to stop collections and remove the remaining balances from consumer's accounts. Dippert v. American Honda Finance Corporation, et al., Case No. 302193 (San Francisco Superior Court).

If you have information about this and would like to contact us, please click here